File photo by Ariana Drehsler

People in San Diego are already feeling higher costs from food, housing and electricity. Now, water rates will also soar.

This week, the San Diego City Council voted to approve a 5.5% water rate increase. It was tough and a couple of the councilmembers couldn’t bring themselves to do it.

“I will not be able to support today’s actions because I simply cannot justify charging water customers more than they already pay,” said Councilmember Vivian Moreno.

Unfortunately, it was just the small first increase of many to come in the next four years.

By the numbers

The city of San Diego last year projected water rates will rise 61% through 2029, adding about $57 per month to the average water bill. That’s almost $700 per year.

That’s the optimistic scenario. And it’s not just the city. Rates will rise in other parts of the county as well.

Why is this happening?

The San Diego region imports most of its water. And just like the water itself flows from the north, the water rate increases are flowing south as well.

Why is this happening? In part, it’s because we use less water. But that means we have to pay more to cover debts.

The city of San Diego purchases most of its water from the San Diego County Water Authority. And the Water Authority buys most of its water from the Metropolitan Water District.

Both those agencies have borrowed money to build infrastructure such as pipes, pumps and dams. This creates an enormous demand for electricity to run the whole system. Electricity is much more expensive now.

But San Diego has also itself taken on three huge projects that we’re paying for.

  • First, we bought a bunch of water from farmers in the Imperial Valley more than 20 years ago at a very high cost.
  • Second, we built a seawater desalination facility and agreed to buy the water for decades at a much higher price than even the imported water.
  • Third, San Diego and Los Angeles are both building large sewage recycling facilities. That will eventually lessen the need for imported water but they are very expensive projects now.

The Metropolitan Water District also wants to build an enormous tunnel to help bring water safely from Northern California. That plan could cost $20 billion and the bill would flow to ratepayers in San Diego.

Looking ahead

Leaders here hope to sell all the water we have bought to provide some relief. But if they don’t do something soon, the backlash could lead to some extreme solutions.

San Diego City Councilmember Marni Von Wilpert shocked observers when she suggested last week that the city withdraw completely from the County Water Authority or at least refuse to pay them.

“I believe we could send a very strong message and vote no, and not pay the increased rates, bring them to the table, say we’re not going to accept this,” she said. “I doubt my colleagues are going to agree with me, but in litigation that’s what we did all the time.”

Scott Lewis oversees Voice of San Diego’s operations, website and daily functions as Editor in Chief. He also writes about local politics, where he frequently...

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

  1. So basically, they’ve been managed by a bunch of morons, for decades, lining the pockets of private corporations, at above market rates. Got it.

    1. With basically the latest one being Mayor Toad with his 1.5 billion toilet water expense while he opened the floodgates to developers in his affordable housing lies. And spoke of financing debt to finally start fixing Hodges dam (after letting water just flow away for several years now), toilet water costs could have fixed 5 dams.

  2. I am going to be a voice in the wilderness and say that I support SDWA’s spending to make us water independent. Before this latest storm, San Diego was 4.8 inches of rain behind the seasonal average.

    Droughts are a fact of life in the Southwest. Our major source of water, the Colorado River, has more people wanting its water than the entire flow of the river. San Diego is at the end of the pipeline for water and political influence. We must protect ourselves or we will be subject to water rationing.

    I am willing to pay more now to have that capacity in place before we need it. Just for reference, I am a 71 yr old retiree, living on Social Security and my apartment is in the ghetto, so I know what living on a tight budget means.

  3. If Scott Lewis was a thorough “investigative” reporter, his article would expose the layers and layers of elected and appointed bureaucrats that have caused this mess with poor decisions and organizational bloat. Also, he should connect the dots between housing growth and demand for water that is not slowing down.

  4. What if anything, has the commenters on this tread done to alleviate our city’s distress and disgusting leadership? NOTHING! At least I failed 14 attempts for local public office to solve your hypocrisy. You have done zero! My name is Smiechowski deal with it! “You break it, you own it.” Colin Powell

  5. 1. Another HUGE reason for high costs is the astronomically high pensions.

    2. The city’s choice to route the “pure” sewage pipes through residential neighborhoods has caused a budget overrun of hundreds of millions of dollars. The actual amount will likely remain a state secret under the coverup policy. This is just one example of many of the city’s poor decision making.

Leave a comment
We expect all commenters to be constructive and civil. We reserve the right to delete comments without explanation. You are welcome to flag comments to us. You are welcome to submit an opinion piece for our editors to review.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.